Overview
Am I making money, and how smooth was the ride?
- Net result, win rate and trade count
- Equity curve
- Underwater curve (time spent below your previous peak)
- Outcome mix — wins, losses, break-even, partials
Trading statistics
Around 35 statistics — profit factor, expectancy, R-multiple distribution, maximum drawdown and its duration, half-Kelly, and breakdowns by pair, session, hour and weekday. All calculated automatically from the trades you backtest or journal, with nothing to build in a spreadsheet.
Read any statistic in R, percentage, money, or pips. Pips matter in forex, and R is the only unit that lets you compare trades of different sizes fairly.
Both run through the same engine, socomparing how you test against how you actually tradeis apples to apples.
Visibility follows data coverage rather than trade source — fill in your levels and a journal gets the same analytical depth as a backtest.
Each group answers a different question about your trading.
Am I making money, and how smooth was the ride?
When I win, do I win enough to pay for the losses?
Am I actually following my own rules?
How bad does it get, and how long do I stay there?
Am I steady, or do results come in bursts?
Where exactly does the money come from?
What are my habits costing me?
The failure mode of every trading dashboard is confident numbers built on samples too small to support them. Split 60 trades across five sessions and you have twelve trades per bucket — enough to produce a dramatic-looking chart, nowhere near enough to conclude anything.
Flow Coach, the AI analysis layer, is built around that problem. It runs statistical significance tests — confidence intervals, standard error, minimum group sizes — before it will make a claim, and it can only narrate numbers the deterministic engine actually computed. It cannot invent a statistic, and it won't tell you London is your best session on the strength of a handful of trades.
Related reading:how many trades you actually need before a statistic means anything.
Start with expectancy, profit factor, and maximum drawdown. Expectancy tells you what an average trade is worth, profit factor tells you whether gross wins cover gross losses, and max drawdown tells you the worst stretch you would have had to sit through. Win rate on its own is the most commonly over-weighted metric, because a 40% win rate at 3R beats a 70% win rate at 0.5R.
Expectancy is the average result of a single trade, usually expressed in R or currency — it answers 'what is one trade worth to me?'. Profit factor is gross profit divided by gross loss across all trades — it answers 'do my winners pay for my losers?'. A profit factor above 1.0 means the system made money over that sample, but it says nothing about how large a drawdown you endured to get there.
More than most traders assume, especially once you split results into buckets. With 20 trades, an observed 60% win rate has a 95% confidence interval of roughly 39% to 78% — a range wide enough to include a losing strategy. Breaking your history down by session or pair divides your sample further, so treat small buckets as directional hints rather than conclusions.
Yes. Backtest trades and journal trades run through the same statistics engine, and you can filter to either one. Because the calculations are identical, the two are directly comparable — which lets you see whether you actually execute the way you tested.
No. Every metric is computed automatically from the trades you log or backtest. Statistics can be displayed in R, percentage, money, or pips, and each metric carries an explanation of what it means.